When someone tells you they're 'progressive' you see that as a positive stance don't you? It's a positive word after all.
And when they tell you they're for 'sustainability' you feel the same positive emotion.
Who wouldn't want to be 'progressive and 'sustainable'?
But the thing is 'progressive' actually means in today's political speak, progressing the agenda of control over you. It means progressing towards a new world order in which your views are ignored for the benefit of mankind - which might be an admirable thing if it wasn't something that is being decided without your being told what it entails, or why, or how or when. And you cannot opt out; it is being done to you and not for you. And you have absolutely no choice or say in the matter.
And in the great scheme of things that might not matter. It is possible that some people are too stupid to be consulted on issues that effect the very survival of mankind. I can understand that. However, if it is such a good thing why aren't you being told about it? So that you can understand and agree with, and support it? I happen not to believe that we're all too stupid to be consulted on this issue. And I think we're being duped by people in 'authority' who have adopted an agenda regardless of our democratic views.
'Sustainability' is a very similar thing. Its definition is 'making use of the planet's resources in a way which doesn't negatively impact on future generations'. Or some such utter bollocks - I can't be arsed to google it but you can, I won't be far off.
What 'sustainability' really means is more control over you. And that means that you pay more - much more - than you should do, mainly in terms of energy and fuel taxes, but it is a much bigger issue than this in reality.
Taken to its extreme - and believe me it is being taken to extreme by the UN and its lackey the EU - 'sustainability' is about Agenda 21 - a single world government for the 21st Century (which is not just a UN initiative but something that has been signed up to by every US president since 1992 and by Common Purpose {common core in the US} - and it involves invasive state control over you and over property, over how many kids one can have, over food production, over property ownership and access to the countryside and open spaces. It involves the state taking over ownership of property for the greater common good, corralling people into cities and restricting the countryside to food production including GM foods.
Essentially it revolves around making all of us who aren't 'more equal than others' into autonomous 'epsilon semi morons' (with apologies to Huxley's Brave New World). It's a Marxist view of the future and it is real. Common Purpose is a real organisation. It 'creates' graduates who are trained to lead 'beyond authority'. It is a sinister and secretive initiative that seeks to control us all.
You think I'm making this up don't you? Don't you?
Do some research. And include ICLIE in your search engines. I did some sometime ago and this is what I found. It answers some of the niggling questions at the back of your mind. It also, if you think about it, explains some of the frankly amazing things that are currently going on in our society including the ignoring of Islam-related crimes that are being ignored in our society.
If, after looking into this you still think 'progressive' and 'sustainable' are positives I'd be amazed.
It's probably about your mindset and whether you want to have some control over your life or be provided for.
That's up to you of course.
If you're in the latter camp, I'd hope you might think that through sometime.
Anyway thanks for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment